Legal Opinion

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Hoyt

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 30, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. John P. Altgeld, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtGary, P. J.

This is an action of covenant by the appellees upon an indenture of lease and agreement made on the 18th day of February, 1880, between the company of the first part, and the appellees (with others since dead) of the second part.

The agreement implies that the parties of the second part liad then a grain elevator standing upon lots described as one and two, and that lots three, four and five were owned by the company. By the indenture the company demised the three lots last named to the parties of the second part, and they covenanted to erect thereon a grain elevator. The company covenanted to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richmond v. Dubuque & Sioux City R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Richmond v. Dubuque & Sioux City R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  3. Richmond v. D. & S. C. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1875

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. HoytAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. HoytAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  3. Orvis v. WaiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API