Legal Opinion
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of Hartford v. Means
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 23, 1967No. 8873PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Circuit Judge:
The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, the appellant, issued an automobile liability insurance policy to Ermal Duff. The policy provided, among other things, that it insured, under certain circumstances, any relative of the named insured “who is a resident of the same household.” Terry Lynn Duff, a son of Ermal Duff, was driving an automobile which became involved in a collision with another car whose occupants were injured and who brought suits against Terry Lynn Duff. Terry owned a car which was insured by Aetna, and Aetna, as the insurer of Terry, defended against the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. SandersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Hercules Casualty Insurance Company v. Preferred Risk Insurance Company, Sue Walters, Wein T. Lee, and Larry Jackson CooperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- American Service Mutual Insurance Company v. Lester J. PughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Hardesty v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. LahmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
3Cited by1 opinion
- The Aetna Casualty And Surety Company Of Hartford, Connecticut, v. Costello MeansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967