Legal Opinion

Riley v. Littlefield

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This is an action of replevin of a race-horse known as “Dr. West,” and of which defendant, as sheriff of Wayne county, was in possession under certain writs of attachment issued out of the Wayne ’circuit court against the goods and property of one Clifton E. Mayne, of Omaha, Neb.

The plaintiff claimed to have obtained the horse of Mayne in May, 1888, in trade of a mare named “Delle *23Murray,” valued at $1,500; the mare’s colt valued at $1,000; and a filley, valued at $1,000. After the trade, Mayne still owed the plaintiff something over $8,000, when, in June following, plaintiff claims that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mizner v. FrazierMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Phenix v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Multiplex Concrete MacHinery Co. v. SaxerMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API