Legal Opinion

Papen v. Suburban Propane Gas Corporation

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided April 27, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’HORA, Judge.

Plaintiffs’ action here grows out of an explosion and fire on plaintiffs’ property. Plaintiffs contend that defendant, a company which supplied propane gas to the property, was responsible for the installation of the gas system in the building in question and for the turning on of the gas and checking the system, was negligent in a number of possible ways allowing gas to escape and accumulate on the premises. Defendant has interposed a general denial to plaintiffs’ allegations of negligence. There are no affirmative defenses asserted.

Plaintiffs have served interrogatories…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Pfeifer v. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1952
  3. Pennsylvania R. v. JulianDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1950
  4. Empire Box Corp. of Stroudsburg v. Illinois Cereal MillsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
  5. Jones v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANYSuperior Court of Delaware · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Green v. BloodsworthSuperior Court of Delaware · 1985
  2. Wolhar v. General Motors Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1997
  3. White v. Ribbons & Bows Daycare, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API