Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re D.T.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 29, 1999No. 99-052Published

1DissentDooley, J.

A major purpose of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA) is to “assure that litigation concerning the custody of a child take place ordinarily in the state with which the child and his family have the closest connection and . . . that courts of this state decline the exercise of jurisdiction when the child and his family have a closer connection with another state.” 1979, No. 136 (Adj. Sess.), § 1(3). By limiting jurisdiction to the state with the closest connection to the family, we prevent forum shopping and continuing controversy over jurisdiction, promote cooperation between…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. L.G. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. In re B.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Peloso v. BotkinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  4. State ex rel. R.P. v. RosenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. In re A.L.H.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API