Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. City of Mountain View
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 18, 1991No. 91-9PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
The City of Mountain View (City) has moved to dismiss the appeal of Albert and Ruby Mitchell because the time for filing the record on appeal has expired. Notice of appeal was filed on September 19, 1990, and the Mitchells have neither filed the record with the Clerk nor responded to the motion to dismiss the appeal.
Ark. R. App. P. 5(a) provides that, “[t]he record on appeal shall be filed with the clerk of the Arkansas Supreme Court and docketed therein within 90 days from the filing of the first notice of appeal, unless the time is extended by order of the trial court as hereinafter…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Johnson v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jon Mills v. Larry NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. MilburnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Osburn v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Mosby v. Office of Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Dalton v. FIRST STATE BANK OF WARRENSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.