Legal Opinion

In Re Smith

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 2012No. 15-17199PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ERIC L. FRANK, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The confirmed chapter 13 plan of Debtor Raymond E. Smith (“the Debtor”) provides, inter alia, that the Debtor will procure a “reverse mortgage” on his residential real property and use the proceeds to pay off the existing mortgage on the property held by M & T Bank (“M & T”).

Before the court is the Debtor’s objection (the “Objection”) to M & T’s amended proof of claim, which is in the amount of $32,053.58. The Debtor bases his objection primarily on the ground that the claim improperly includes charges assessed after the entry of a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Great Western Mining & Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Mullarkey v. TamboerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re CullerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. In RE McELWEEUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. McElwee v. Scarff Bros. (In re McElwee)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. In re DavisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2017
  5. In re HinkleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API