Legal Opinion
Mead Johnson and Co. v. South Plainfield
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 26, 1967PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
95 N.J. Super. 455 (1967)
231 A.2d 816
MEAD JOHNSON AND COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS, IN THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 12, 1967.
Decided June 26, 1967.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, KILKENNY and COLLESTER.
Mr. Richard M. Goldman argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Stein, Bliablias and Goldman, attorneys).
Mr. Harman R. Clark, Jr. argued the cause for respondent, Borough of South Plainfield.
Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Borough of Roselle v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Hornauer v. Div. of Alcoholic Beverage ControlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- General Electric Co. v. City of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- City of Jersey City v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Halligan & McLellan, Inc. v. New Jersey State Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brown v. FauverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- In Re Tenure Hearing of GrossmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- CATH. CHAR., DIO. OF CAMDEN v. PleasantvilleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Brown v. FauverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Bell v. Tp. of Bass RiverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.