Legal Opinion

People v. Harrington

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1976No. 55136, (Calendar No. 17)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

(to affirm). Defendant was prosecuted for possession of a small residue of heroin, visible to the naked eye, in the form of a hard powdery substance on the interior of a bottle cap. Defendant sought to avoid conviction by asking this Court to construe this state’s former statute making it a felony for "any person not having a license * * * [to] possess or have under his control any narcotic drug” to require *38possession of a "usable amount”. We affirm defendant’s conviction on these facts and reject the "usable amount” and the Court of Appeals "remnant of a usable amount” tests.

I — Facts

February…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. People v. LealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  4. State v. MorenoArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Edelin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. VanceHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. MizellNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. DelongchampsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. RamsdellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. People v. MaliskeyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API