Legal Opinion

Parenzan v. Parenzan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Friedmann, J.

At issue on the instant appeal is whether New York has “continuing exclusive jurisdiction” over a child support order issued in this State pursuant to a 1982 separation agreement between the parties and a 1983 divorce judgment entered in this State (hereinafter the New York child support order) under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (Family Ct Act art 5-B [hereinafter UIFSA]).

In order to resolve this issue, we must first determine whether subsequent child support orders issued by an Indiana court in 1987 and 1990, as a result of petitions filed by the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stidham v. WhelchelIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Banton v. MathersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Lanum v. LanumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Nichols v. BarduaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. Thompson v. ThompsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of Pauls v. NeatheryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Clemens v. ClemensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Shafer v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Colapinto v. HeinflingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Erlich v. ErlichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API