In the Interest of K.R.

ORDER

After remand,1 J.R.2 appeals from the judgment terminating his parental rights to K.R. pursuant to Section 211.447 RSMo 1994.3 In his first point, Father contends the trial court erred in that its findings pursuant to Section 211.447.2(2) are not supported by substantial evidence and are against the weight of the evidence. For his second point, Father argues the trial court erred in applying the factors set forth in Section 211.447.3, particularly Section 211.447.3(4).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence…