In re Appeal of Little Printing Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.
The issue presented in this case is whether appellant satisfied the requirements of R.C. 4141.28(E) in order to contest the employees’ continued claims for benefits. Because this court finds that an eligibility notice, as described in R.C. 4141.28(E), need only be filed once when the facts concerning employee eligibility for benefits remain the same, this court holds that the $39,530 charge against appellant’s account was inappropriate.
R.C. 4141.28 sets out the procedures to be followed in claiming unemployment benefits. A claimant must first file an application for determination of benefit…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Justice v. Lutheran Social ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Pioneer Asphalt v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Radcliffe v. Artromick International, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987