Legal Opinion

Caldwell, Hunter & Co. v. Dawson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 17, 1862PublishedCited by 9 opinions

CASS 18 — PETITION ORDINARY cited New American^ Cyclopedia, title “Bushel;” Tomlin'’s Lav) Dictionary, .title “fSushel, or Measure, or Weight;” 2 Stat. Law, 1535; 1 Met. K., 5(1*2; 5 Dana, 503; Chitty’s Pleading, 219. cited sec. 1 act of 1798; 2 Stat Law, Ky., page 1535.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE BULLITT

delivered the opinion op the court:

Dawson made two contracts with the appellants, one in March, 1851, the other in January, 1852, by each of which he agreed to deliver to them, at the Crooked Creek Furnace, in Bullitt county, 50,000 bushels of good charcoal, for which they agreed to pay him 3-J- cents per bushel. Dawson sued upon said contracts, alleging that he had delivered 69,576 bushels under the first, and 56,887 bushels under the second contract; and that the appellants had not paid him therefor, but owed him abalance of $800 over and above what he had received from them…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CrowleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Hazen v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
  3. McAndrews v. BelknapCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  4. Shaw v. Ingram-Day Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. In Re Bowling Green Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API