Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Jones v. Ingram

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 7, 1996No. 1950577Published

1ConcurrenceHouston, Justice

As the author of gratuitous dicta in Webster v. Cetinkaya, 638 So.2d 834, 835 (Ala.1994) (“We also note that Russell County was not the proper venue for the action, because the accident did not occur in Russell County and Cetinkaya was not a resident of, and could not be found in, Russell County. Rule 82(b), Ala.R.Civ.P.”), I write specially to note that the common law rule of venue as to actions at law against nonresident defendants (who are not covered by the venue statute regarding actions at law against individuals) controls the present case and there is, therefore, no need to resort to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LashleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Ex Parte BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Webster v. CentinkayaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API