Wadle v. Jones
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
SCHULTZ, Justice.
The principal question raised on this appeal from a judgment awarding damages for personal injuries is whether we should retain the pro tanto credit rule. The trial court applied this rule, allowing a dollar-for-dollar credit against plaintiff’s recovery for consideration received from other joint tortfeasors under a settlement agreement. The other issues raised concern opinion testimony by a lay witness, a proposed jury instruction, and a contribution award. We find no merit in any of the parties’ assignments of error and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
' At…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schnebly Ex Rel. Schnebly v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Theobald v. AngelosSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Leas in Interest of O'NealSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Ganrud v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Meeker v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Board of Education v. Zando, Martin & Milstead, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Beeck v. Aquaslide 'N' Dive Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- State v. DvorskySupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Sonnek v. WarrenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.