Legal Opinion

Wadle v. Jones

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 25, 1981No. 64422PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHULTZ, Justice.

The principal question raised on this appeal from a judgment awarding damages for personal injuries is whether we should retain the pro tanto credit rule. The trial court applied this rule, allowing a dollar-for-dollar credit against plaintiff’s recovery for consideration received from other joint tortfeasors under a settlement agreement. The other issues raised concern opinion testimony by a lay witness, a proposed jury instruction, and a contribution award. We find no merit in any of the parties’ assignments of error and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

' At…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Schnebly Ex Rel. Schnebly v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Theobald v. AngelosSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. Leas in Interest of O'NealSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  4. Ganrud v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  5. Meeker v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Board of Education v. Zando, Martin & Milstead, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Beeck v. Aquaslide 'N' Dive Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. State v. DvorskySupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  5. Sonnek v. WarrenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API