Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Carr-Consolidated Biscuit Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 6, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Cammack

Affirming.

This is a personal injury action instituted by an infant married woman in which the judgment must be *236affirmed, if we adhere to our ruling in the case of Hicks v. Steele, 309 Ky. 833, 219 S.W.2d 35.

In the Hicks Case we held that a plea of limitation, as was made in the case before us, was good because the infant married woman failed to institute her action within one year after the date of her injury. The decision was based upon cases interpreting Sections 35, 36 and 391 of the Civil Code of Practice, which govern the institution and defense ^ of actions by married…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hicks v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holbert v. WestDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1990
  2. Wenneker v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API