Legal Opinion

Singh v. 106-108 Bayard Street Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 5, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered January 7, 2000, which, inter alia, denied defendant’s cross motion insofar as it sought summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs Labor Law § 241 (6) and § 200 claims, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, the “safety hat” provision of the Industrial Code (12 NYCRR 23-1.8 [c] [1]) is sufficiently concrete and specific in its mandate to support plaintiffs Labor Law § 241 (6) claim (see generally Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co., 81 NY2d 494, 505; and see McByrne v Ambassador Constr. Co., 290…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Joblon v. SolowNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Reliance National Insurance v. Sapiens International Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. McByrne v. Ambassador Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Noriega v. State Street Bank & Trust Co. of ConnecticutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Empire 326 Grand LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  2. Arnold v. Empire 326 Grand LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API