Legal Opinion

In re Smith

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Kossuth District Court.— Hon. W. B. Quar-ton, Judge. The applicant was granted a permit, and the remonstrants appeal.—

1Opinion of the Court

Sherwin, J.—

*129l. Trial of Application for permit: appeal. *128A motion to dismiss the appeal, was submitted with the case, without argument thereon by either side, and we shall first consider the several points made *129therein. The appellants contested the application for a per-by filing a written remonstrance under the provisions of section 2389 of the Code, where-upon a trial was had upon the petition and remonstrance, and after a full hearing the permit was granted, and an appeal perfected by the remonstrants. The motion to dismiss is based upon the contention that an appeal does not lie in these…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Darling v. BoeschSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  2. State v. SchmidtzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  3. In re HenerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. In re Application for a Permit of ThomaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. In re WilhelmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Muncey v. CollinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. In re MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API