Legal Opinion
Orgeron v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided February 27, 1985No. Civ. A. 81-2699PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MENTZ, District Judge.
The defendant, E.D. Bullard, filed a motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s claim that he contracted silicosis due to the negligence of the defendant. On October 17, 1984, the Court heard oral argument on the summary judgment motion and at that time denied the motion on the basis that insufficient evidence had been presented that plaintiff’s claim had prescribed. Then, Bullard filed a motion for reconsideration of its motion for summary judgment. At the hearing on January 9, 1985, the Court took the motion filed on behalf of Bullard under…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Casey Enterprises, Inc. And D/B/A Pendley Hills Hardware and Minit Check Grocery, Fite H. Casey, Jr. v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Cartwright v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
- Cartwright v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
- Duhon v. SaloomLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Julius Ducre v. Mine Safety Appliances, Joseph Bartholomew v. Avondale Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co. v. WilliamsonDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1997
- Stevison v. CHARLES ST. DIZIER, LTD.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Clofer v. Celotex Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- Nasco, Inc. v. Calcasieu Television and Radio, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.