Legal Opinion
Ronald K. Rose v. Union Central Life Insurance Co. Commercial and Industrial Adm. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 16, 1994No. 92-16657Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
19 F.3d 1441
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Ronald K. ROSE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNION CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.; Commercial and Industrial
Adm. Co. et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-16657.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 9, 1994.
Decided March 16, 1994.
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDUM*
2
Ronald Rose…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Adrian C. Eichman v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Blanton v. AnzaloneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Wang Laboratories, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Paul G. Kagan, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Keith Farrell, William Murray and Richard Richardson v. Automobile Club of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Northern California Retail Clerks Unions v. Jumbo Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990