Legal Opinion

Stanley v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 2006No. 92A03-0512-CR-600PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

In this belated appeal, Appellant-Defendant Joshua P. Stanley (“Stanley”) appeals the trial court’s determination that he is a habitual offender — a determination that resulted in the imposition of a fifteen-year sentencing enhancement. Because Stanley’s appeal follows a guilty plea and an admission of being a habitual offender, we dismiss without prejudice to his right to raise the issue in a subsequent post-conviction proceeding.

Issue

Stanley raises one issue, which we restate as whether his belated appeal, the crux of which concerns the sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tumulty v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Collins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Butler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Hendrix v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Kling v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brandon Robey v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Jacob Lumbley v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Brandon C. Staggs v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Samuel Jude Clark v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Timothy W. Allen v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API