Stanley v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAILEY, Judge.
Case Summary
In this belated appeal, Appellant-Defendant Joshua P. Stanley (“Stanley”) appeals the trial court’s determination that he is a habitual offender — a determination that resulted in the imposition of a fifteen-year sentencing enhancement. Because Stanley’s appeal follows a guilty plea and an admission of being a habitual offender, we dismiss without prejudice to his right to raise the issue in a subsequent post-conviction proceeding.
Issue
Stanley raises one issue, which we restate as whether his belated appeal, the crux of which concerns the sufficiency of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tumulty v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Collins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Butler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Hendrix v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Kling v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brandon Robey v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Jacob Lumbley v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Brandon C. Staggs v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Samuel Jude Clark v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Timothy W. Allen v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019