Legal Opinion

Clemons v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 21, 2001No. 4D00-3603Published

1Per curiam

Affirm. As to Clemons’ claim challenging the legality of her sentence in light of the unconstitutionality of the 1995 sentencing guidelines pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), our affirmance is without prejudice to refile a facially sufficient postconviction motion claim. See Rivero v. State, 758 So.2d 723 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

This affirmance is likewise without prejudice to Clemons presenting her gaintime claim administratively to the Department of Corrections, and, if necessary, seeking review of the Department’s ultimate decision through extraordinary writ petition to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Gatto v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Rivero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API