Sherwood v. St. Paul & Chicago Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court, for Winona county.
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
For convenience we will speak of tbe respondents in the appeal at bar as plaintiffs, and of the appellant as defendant. Plaintiffs are owners of a tract of land, consisting of lots 4, 5, 6, 7, and of adjoining portions of lots 3 and 8, in block 13, in the village of Dresbach, which is di*123vided into lots as numbered on the following diagram, viz:
The dwelling-house in which plaintiffs resided, was situate on lots 6 and 7, and the remainder of the tract was used and occupied, in connection with the dwelling-house, as a site for out-buildings, for a garden, orchard, etc. Defendant’s railway was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Winona & St. Peter Railroad v. DenmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
- Lake Superior & Mississippi Railroad v. GreveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
- St. Paul & Sioux City Railroad v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1873
- Hursh v. First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
- Warren v. First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
3Cited by18 opinions
- Maher v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Port Huron & South-Western Railway Co. v. VoorheisMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Yellowstone Park Railroad v. Bridger Coal Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1906
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.