Norman Gotcher, Jr. v. Tana Wood
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
The Court has reconsidered its holding in Gotcher v. Wood, 66 F.3d 1097 (9th Cir.1995), in light of Edwards v. Balisok, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1584, 137 L.Ed.2d 906 (1997). We agree with Wood that Edwards forecloses Gotcher’s entire compensatory claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Because we do not reach the issue of whether Gotcher has a protectable liberty interest in receiving good-time credits or remaining free of disciplinary segregation, we deny Gotcher’s request to republish parts of our earlier decision. The district court’s dismissal of Gotcher’s claim is
AFFIRMED.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Norman GOTCHER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tana WOOD, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barone v. HatcherDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1997
- Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D. William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- York v. Huerta-GarciaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1999