Legal Opinion

Norman Gotcher, Jr. v. Tana Wood

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 11, 1997No. 94-35484PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Court has reconsidered its holding in Gotcher v. Wood, 66 F.3d 1097 (9th Cir.1995), in light of Edwards v. Balisok, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1584, 137 L.Ed.2d 906 (1997). We agree with Wood that Edwards forecloses Gotcher’s entire compensatory claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Because we do not reach the issue of whether Gotcher has a protectable liberty interest in receiving good-time credits or remaining free of disciplinary segregation, we deny Gotcher’s request to republish parts of our earlier decision. The district court’s dismissal of Gotcher’s claim is

AFFIRMED.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Norman GOTCHER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tana WOOD, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barone v. HatcherDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1997
  2. Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D. William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. York v. Huerta-GarciaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1999