Legal Opinion

Engel v. Fischer

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided December 15, 1884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court (Van Vorst, J.).

— The defendant, residing in Austria, in the month of Hay, 1873, incurred the obligar tion as acceptor of the draft which is the subject of this action. In July, 1873, the defendant absconded from Austria and came to the city of New York, and “ for the purpose of concealing himself from his creditors assumed a fictitious name, and has ever since borne and been hiding under such fictitious name.” The draft matured after the defendant took up his residence in New York. In April, 1882, the plaintiff, the owner of the draft, discovered defendant in the city of New…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. First Massachusetts Turnpike Corp. v. FieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  2. Holmes v. TremperNew York Supreme Court · 1822
  3. Cole v. . JessupNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  4. Fowler v. HuntNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  5. Poillon v. . LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Balcom v. TerwilligerNew York Supreme Court · 1886
  2. McCredie v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API