May v. May
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Judge.
Sue May employed Georgia attorney Zuckerman to collect in Georgia on a Tennessee judgment against Charles May based on back alimony and child support which had accrued under a Tennessee divorce. The letter fee agreement provided that, in order to recover the money owed to Sue May, Zuckerman would “begin the necessary action here in Georgia.” Zuckerman agreed to handle the case on a “contingency fee basis,” and “on all sums recovered” he would “be entitled to 25 percent” as his fee.
Pursuant to the agreement, the Tennessee money judgment was domesticated in Georgia. Acting on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDonald v. NapierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
- Middleton v. WestmorelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Woodward v. LawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Overman v. All Cities Transfer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Moorefield v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- GREER, KLOSIK AND DAUGHERTY v. YetmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- ELLERIN & ASSOCIATES v. BrawleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Gilbert v. Montlick & Associates, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- In Re Chewning & Frey Security, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
- Yetman v. Gilbert Corp. of DelawareCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.