Legal Opinion

Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Choppy Productions, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.

Plaintiff Howard R. Hughes proves for summary judgment against all the defendants. He also moves for a protective order vacating the notice served by defendant People Pants to take his deposition upon-oral examination. Defendants Choppy Productions, Inc. and Flame Enterprises move to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. The three motions are consolidated for purposes of disposition and will be passed on seriatim. In a combined complaint, each plaintiff alleges a cause of actiop. in his own behalf.

Plaintiff Hughes’ cause of action is for a permanent injunction under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Opera Ass'n, Inc. v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Gautier v. Pro-Football, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Metropolitan Opera Ass'n v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  4. South Bay Center, Inc. v. Butler, Herrick & MarshallNew York Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anabas Export Ltd. v. Alper Industries Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  2. Committee for the Preservation of Fresh Meadows, Inc. v. Fresh Meadows AssociatesNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Guglielmi v. Spelling-Goldberg ProductionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Guglielmi v. Spelling-Goldberg ProductionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Lugosi v. Universal PicturesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API