Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lambert v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 14, 1999No. F-96-1567Published

1Concurrence

LUMPKIN, Vice Presiding Judge,

concur in the results:

¶ 1 I concur in the results reached by the Court both as to the affirmance of the conviction and the judgment rendered as to the sentence.

¶ 2 I dissented to the vacation of the murder convictions and sentences of death in the original Lambert appeal. Lambert v. State, 888 P.2d 494, 507 (Okl.Cr.1994). Therefore, I wholeheartedly agree with the affirmance of the murder convictions and sentence of death in this opinion. However, I am not sure the Court’s explanation of why it can vacate the convictions for the underlying felonies is totally…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Plessy v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Dred Scott v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1857

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API