Lambert v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Concurrence
LUMPKIN, Vice Presiding Judge,
concur in the results:
¶ 1 I concur in the results reached by the Court both as to the affirmance of the conviction and the judgment rendered as to the sentence.
¶ 2 I dissented to the vacation of the murder convictions and sentences of death in the original Lambert appeal. Lambert v. State, 888 P.2d 494, 507 (Okl.Cr.1994). Therefore, I wholeheartedly agree with the affirmance of the murder convictions and sentence of death in this opinion. However, I am not sure the Court’s explanation of why it can vacate the convictions for the underlying felonies is totally…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Plessy v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Dred Scott v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.