Legal Opinion · Dissent

LaReau v. MacDougall

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 15, 1972No. 664, Docket 71-1555Published

1DissentMoore, Circuit Judge

The Court’s opinion appears to contain two findings of violations of La-Reau’s Eighth Amendment rights. The Court clearly says that it believes the conditions in the strip cell fall below the Constitutional minimum. In footnote six, however, the Court adds:

Even if the strip cell could be justified for serious offenses, it was a grossly severe penalty for LaReau’s offense.

I believe the Court errs in both of these holdings.

The majority focuses on two aspects of strip cell confinement which they believe combine to violate the minimum standards of the Eighth Amendment. The “Chinese toilet” and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Lawrence William Wright v. Daniel McMann as Warden of Clinton State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. Louis Martinez v. Vincent R. Mancusi, Warden, Attica Prison, Dr. Williams, Dr. Stamburg, and Nurse Hoffman, Attica PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  4. Charles H. Baldwin v. Robert G. Smith, as Warden of the Vermont State Prison, Windsor, VermontCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. LaReau v. MacDougallDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API