Legal Opinion

Karz v. Overton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 14, 1971No. 71-339PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANN, Judge.

The dictum of a distinguished jurist, Judge Reed, of the Fourth District Court of Appeal,1 prompted Karz to seek mandamus to compel the trial judge to grant a preliminary hearing. Florida Statutes, § 907.045 (1970), F.S.A.2 provides a mandatory preliminary hearing for those charged by indictment or information only after the defendant has been held in custody thirty days. Karz was charged by information and has been in custody less than thirty days. Hence mandamus does not lie. In Shailer, a trial judge had exercised his authority to grant a preliminary hearing for cause thought…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Dawson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  3. Di Bona v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  4. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  5. In Re Pennington v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State Ex Rel. Hardy v. BlountSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  3. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API