Legal Opinion

State v. Nicholson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1969No. 36986, 36987PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewton, J.

Appellants were convicted, on pleas of guilty, of robbery and assault with intent to rape. The present actions have been brought under the Post Conviction Act, but at least three habeas corpus actions have been heretofore filed and heard.

It is the present contention of appellants that their constitutional rights were violated because extradition proceedings were improper; the complaints, warrants, and informations were defective; and their guilty pleas were the result of coercion. They further complain that they were unlawfully denied an evidentiary hearing and the services of court-appointed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State v. HizelNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Smith v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Nicholson v. SiglerNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Hunt v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HenryNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. BartlettNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. CostelloNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. WileyNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Maddox v. SiglerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API