Legal Opinion

United States v. Cleveland & Colo. Cattle Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado

Decided January 9, 1888PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Equity. On motion to dissolve an injunction. Bill for injunction by the United States to restrain defendant, the Cleveland & Colorado Cattle Company, from fencing up, and improperly using, part of the public domain.

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

This case is before me now on a motion to dissolve a preliminary injunction. The bill was filed in June, 1886, and upon notice, and after hearing, the preliminary injunction was granted by Judge Hallett. In the order granting such injunction, no leave was reserved to move for a dissolution after the filing of the answer; and when this motion was brought on for hearing my impressions were very strong that it was not good practice to entertain such motion, and I suggested to counsel on the argument whether, when an injunction had been granted upon notice, and after hearing, the true rule was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maxwell Land-Grant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Tameling v. United States Freehold and Emigration Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. FooteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. United States v. Henrylyn Irr. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1912
  3. United States v. CameronArizona Supreme Court · 1889
  4. United States v. CamfieldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1894
  5. Strong v. Sunray DX Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API