Legal Opinion
Pines v. Lopez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 18, 2011PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant established prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on plaintiffs claims of permanent and significant limitations. Defendants submitted, inter alia, the affirmed reports of an expert orthopedist, who, after reviewing plaintiffs medical records and examining him, found no limitations in the range of motion of plaintiffs knees and opined that plaintiffs injuries were the result of severe degenerative arthritis in both knees.
In opposition, plaintiff did not raise a triable issue of fact. He failed to present admissible evidence of contemporaneous range of motion…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Style v. JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Yang v. AlstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Batts v. Medical Express Ambulance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dorrian v. CantalicioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Thomas v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Dorrian v. CantalicioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Lugo v. Adom Rental Transportation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Lugo v. Adom Rental Transportation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.