Valley Bank v. Neibaur
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
Following the issuance of the opinion in this case, the Court granted rehearing to consider whether the Neibaurs should be precluded under I.C. § 28-3-406 from asserting Palmer’s unauthorized indorsement. This issue was raised before the magistrate judge, on appeal to the district judge, and on appeal to this Court. We did *734not specifically address the issue in our original opinion.
The statute on which Valley Bank bases its argument provides:
28-3-406. Negligence contributing to alteration or unauthorized signature.— Any person who by [that person’s] negligence substantially…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Twellman v. Lindell Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. Hepler State BankCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
- Continental Bank v. Wa-Ho Truck BrokerageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Eatinger v. First National Bank of LewistownMontana Supreme Court · 1982
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weaver v. Searle Bros.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998
- Valley Bank v. NeibaurIdaho Supreme Court · 1991