Legal Opinion

Valley Bank v. Neibaur

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1991No. 18033PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

Following the issuance of the opinion in this case, the Court granted rehearing to consider whether the Neibaurs should be precluded under I.C. § 28-3-406 from asserting Palmer’s unauthorized indorsement. This issue was raised before the magistrate judge, on appeal to the district judge, and on appeal to this Court. We did *734not specifically address the issue in our original opinion.

The statute on which Valley Bank bases its argument provides:

28-3-406. Negligence contributing to alteration or unauthorized signature.— Any person who by [that person’s] negligence substantially…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Twellman v. Lindell Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. Hepler State BankCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  3. Continental Bank v. Wa-Ho Truck BrokerageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  4. Eatinger v. First National Bank of LewistownMontana Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weaver v. Searle Bros.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Valley Bank v. NeibaurIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API