Legal Opinion

32 West Randolph Corp. v. Edward Blackman, Edward Blackman v. Balaban & Katz Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 10, 1955No. 11270, 11279PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge.

Two separate appeals from a single final order, entered below July 2, 1954, are considered, in this opinion. We are asked by 32 West Randolph Corporation, appellant in number 11270, to review part of that order holding Blackman’s attorney’s lien valid, and ruling appellant’s petition insufficient. Blackman, on the other hand, rests his appeal, numbered 11279, on a phase of that same order dismissing his cross and counterclaim. Facts relevant to this opinion follow.

Blackman, a member of the Illinois bar, was employed by 32 West Randolph Corporation, which we will refer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Standidge v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Berkemeier v. Dormuralt Motor Sales, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Iowa Hydro Electric Cooperative v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  2. First Iowa Hydro Electric Cooperative v. Iowa-Illinois Gas And Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API