Legal Opinion

Unger v. Horn

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 20, 1987No. 59,808PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

The plaintiffs, public officials, sought review by the district court of the county election officer’s determination that recall petitions to remove them from office were legally sufficient. K.S.A. 25-4331. The district court upheld the decision of the county election officer. Plaintiffs appeal.

Evan Unger and Ronald Temple are elected and acting members of the Unified School District No. 294 Board of Education. Separate petitions for their recall from office were filed with Marilyn Horn, county clerk and county election officer. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. PattersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Wysong v. WaldenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Wallace v. TrippMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Mueller v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Herron v. McClanahanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Eveleigh v. ConnessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. Cline v. TittelCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  3. State of Alaska, Office of Lieutenant Governor, Division of Elections and Director Gail Fenumiai, in an official capacity v. Recall DunleavyAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Cline v. MeisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  5. Garvin v. JeromeSupreme Court of Florida · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API