Legal Opinion

Highland Hills Hospital v. Louisiana

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided March 6, 1996No. Civil Action No. 95-1862Published

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND

POLOZOLA, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on a motion to remand filed by the plaintiff, Highland Hills Hospital (“Highland Hills”). For the reasons which follow, the motion is denied.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Pursuant to Title XIX of the Social Security Act,1 the federal government distributes funds to Louisiana for the care of indigent medical patients. Louisiana has charged its Department of Health and Hospitals (the “DHH”) with distributing these funds to qualifying health care facilities around the state.2 The DHH distributes the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. S.W.S. Erectors, Inc. v. Infax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. Debra Kidd v. Southwest Airlines, Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  5. Erma W. Hines v. Cenla Community Action Committee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API