Charles P. Kellogg & Co. v. Miller
Oregon Supreme Court
Jackson county: L. R. Webster, Judge. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
On July 29, 1890, C. J. Kurth and John W. Miller, partners doing business under the firm name of Kurth & Miller, being insolvent, made a general assignment of all their property to appellant D. H. Miller for the benefit of their creditors. At the time of the assignment, Kurth & Miller were indebted to respondents Charles P. Kellogg & Co. in the sum of one thousand four hundred and forty-eight dollars and ninety cents on a promissory note, for goods, wares, and merchandise, which indebtedness was secured by a mortgage upon certain real property of the probable value of eight hundred dollars.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Slee v. BloomNew York Supreme Court · 1822
- People v. E. Remington & SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Amory v. FrancisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1820
- In re BatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- Wurtz, Austin & McVeigh v. HartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Chemical Nat. Bank v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
- Tod v. Kentucky Union Land Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1893
- Doe v. Northwestern Coal & Transportation Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1896
- Jamison v. Adler-Goldman Commission Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Williams v. OverholtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.