Legal Opinion
Apartment Specialists, Inc. v. Purolator Courier Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 3, 1986No. Civ. A. 85-0969PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOHN GARRETT PENN, District Judge.
The plaintiff charges the defendant with breach of contract, negligence, and alleges that the contract was unconscionable and that plaintiff entered into the contract due to fraud, misrepresentation and detrimental reliance. 1 The case is now before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
I
The underlying facts are as follows: The plaintiff is engaged in the manufacture and installation of commercial draperies and depends for a substantial part of its business on Federal Supply Schedule contracts let by the United States government…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A. v. Eastern Airlines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- District-Realty Title Insurance Corporation v. Rudolf Ensmann, James S. SollinsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Ragsdale v. Airborne Freight Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
3Cited by12 opinions
- Todd Heller, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- United States Gold Corp. v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Angela Cummings, Inc. v. Purolator Courier Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Uniden Corp. of America v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Wagman v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.