Legal Opinion

Ames Department Stores, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities Ex Rel. Lewis

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided April 30, 1997No. File 96-0556394PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaloney, J.

The plaintiff, Ames Department Stores, Inc. (Ames), appeals from the decision of the defendant commission on human rights and opportunities (commission) finding that Ames discriminated against an employee on account of the employee’s race and ordering Ames to reinstate the employee with back pay. The commission acted pursuant to General Statutes §§ 46a-60 and 46a-86. Ames appeals pursuant to General Statutes § 4-183. The court finds the issues in favor of the commission.

Kendell Lewis, a former employee of Ames, filed a complaint against Ames with the commission on January 3,1992, which he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Connecticut Building Wrecking Co. v. CarothersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Briggs v. State Employees Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ames Department Stores, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  2. Norwalk Board of Education v. State, Chro, No. Cv 00 0505526 (Sep. 28, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API