Legal Opinion

Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. People ex rel. Langhans

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1906PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Vermilion county; the Hon. E. R. E. Kimbrough, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkin

On May 16, 1904, the relator filed an amended petition in the circuit court of Vermilion county, as a resident and tax-payer of the city of Danville, against appellant, praying for a writ of mandamus to compel it to stop its trains at thq North street depot, in said city. On the 18th the defendant filed its answer, and on October io the petitioner filed his replication. The cause was tried by the court, without the intervention of a jury, and a judgment was rendered granting the prayer of the petition as to certain specified trains, and for costs of suit. To reverse that judgment this appeal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pacific Railroad v. SeelySupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. St. Joseph & Denver City Rld. v. RyanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  4. People ex rel. Hunt v. Chicago & Alton RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Marsh v. Fairbury, Pontiac & Northwestern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1872

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Michigan Cent. R. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  2. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Chicago Mechanics' InstituteIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Cloth v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  4. In re WheelerNew York Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. McAdowMontana Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API