Legal Opinion

Taylor, Farr & Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 16, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from, Fayette District Court. — Hon. W. A. Hoyt,. Judge. This is an action to recover damages by reason of the delay of the defendant in transmitting a telegram from Webster, in the state of South Dakota, to Aberdeen, in the same state. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.

1 I. On the twenty-fourth or twenty-fifth day of March, 1893, the plaintiffs shipped a car load of horses from West Union, in this state, destined to Monango, N. D. The shipment was in charge oi Taylor, a member of plaintiffs’ firm. The car arrived at a transfer near St. Paul on Saturday morning, where the horses were unloaded and fed, and were reloaded at about 6 o’clock in the evening, and proceeded on over the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway to Aberdeen, in South Dakota, where it was necessary to remain over night, and reship from that point on the following morning. Before reaching…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sutton v. Town of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Arnold v. PotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  3. Schmid v. HumphreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  4. Indiana ex rel. Stone v. HelmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  5. Tingle v. C., B. & Q. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1882

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Armbruster v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Hendershot v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  4. Baker Wire Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API