Legal Opinion

Horton v. Pintchunck

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 4, 1900PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action for malicious prosecution. Before Judge Nottingham. City court of Macon. June term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.

Horton instituted an action against Pintchunck, in the city court of Macon, in which he sought to recover damages for a malicious prosecution which he alleged Pintchunck commenced and carried on against him. The amount claimed as damages was one thousand dollars. The defendant filed a plea in which he admitted that he did swear out a warrant and caused the arrest of the plaintiff as alleged in the petition. He, however, averred the existence of certain facts which authorized him to do so, and which he claimed justified him in swearing out the warrant and causing the arrest of the plaintiff.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abel v. Jarratt & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Ransone v. ChristianSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. South Georgia Grocery Co. v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Binder v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. Hodsdon v. WhitworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Holloway v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API