Legal Opinion

R.G. v. Department of Children & Family Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 5, 2001No. 3D01-366PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Affirmed. We find no merit in the assertion that the trial court’s order did not state the facts upon which the finding of dependency is based. Section 39.507(5), Florida Statutes (2000), requires the court to enter an order briefly stating the facts upon which its finding is based. See Castellanos v. Department of Health and Rehab. Servs., 545 So.2d 455, 458 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The trial court here provided ample facts to support its finding of dependency as to both children. Additionally, any due process concerns were never raised before the trial court and are therefore barred. See Hill v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. H.C., the Mother v. Department of Children and FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  2. J.G. v. Dep't of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. J.G. v. Dep't of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API