Legal Opinion
In re Weinstock
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 8, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The respondent was served with a petition containing four charges of professional misconduct. By decision and order of this Court dated December 15, 2000, he was granted a hearing solely on mitigation, and was determined to be collaterally estopped from contesting any factual issues at the hearing. After the hearing on the issue of mitigation, the Special Referee sustained all four charges. The petitioner now moves to confirm the Special Referee’s report. The respondent cross-moves to disaffirm the Special Referee’s report, to dismiss the petition, and to refer the matter…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Weinstock v. WeinstockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
4Cited by4 opinions
- Weinstock v. Handler (In Re Handler)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Weinstock v. Handler (In Re Handler)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Grievance Committee v. WeinstockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Matter of FritzschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019