Legal Opinion

City of Detroit v. Murphy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

'Certiorari' to recorder's court of Detroit t.O' review a. • •street-opening proceeding. (Chambers, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcG-rath, J.

This is certiorari to review a street-opening proceeding had under the general law (3 How. Stat. § 3064a et seq.), in which there were some 35 respondents. The proceeding was commenced August 25, 1891. The verdict was filed March 5, 1892, and was confirmed March 29, 1892. . The writ of certiorari was allowed September 12, 1892. The plaintiffs in certiorari appeared in said proceeding, as did all of the respondents, except six, and all the errors alleged relate to proceedings anterior to the verdict of the jury. Indeed, it is conceded by counsel for plaintiffs in certiorari that they are here…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re LantisMichigan Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Consolidated Apparel Co. v. Common Council of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Pullman Co. v. State Board of EqualizationIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  3. West v. ParkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Beutel v. Bay Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Burnett v. SwaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API