Legal Opinion

Scott v. Spencer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1895No. 5943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.

As intimated in the opinion heretofore filed in this case (42 Neb., 632), the proceeding below was one for the enforcement of a mechanic’s lien against certain property in the city of Kearney, in which the appellant the Metcalf Cracker Company was alleged to have an interest.

The answer was in effect a disclaimer of title by the defendant named, which alone appeals from a decree for the plaintiff based upon a general finding in his favor. The argument of counsel for appellant when the cause was first submitted to us was directed to the merits of the controversy, but an examination of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. . the Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. Romeyn v. SicklesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Levy v. ChittendenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Homan v. Steele, Johnson & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Scott v. SpencerNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Simms v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. Eicher v. EicherNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  3. O'NEIL v. Union National Life Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Meyer v. Sandhills Beef, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Hensley v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API