Legal Opinion

Feliciano v. Dennyson

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided July 21, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00247Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WILLIAM FELICIANO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 3:20-cv-00247-SMY ) JERRY DENNYSON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YANDLE, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 84).1 Defendants, who were initially named as Jane Does 1-5, argue that Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the statute of limitations because he did not seek leave to substitute individuals for the Jane Doe defendants until more than three years after the alleged incidents occurred. For the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. KRUPSKI v. COSTA CROCIERE S. P. ASupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. James T. Donald v. Cook County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Justin Herrera v. Teresa ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  4. Hoban v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API