Legal Opinion

Smith v. Cushatt

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 10, 1925PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vermilion, J. —

The mortgage in question contained a provision as folloAvs:

“A failure to comply with any of the agreements hereof shall cause the whole debt at once to become due and collectible, at the option of the second party without notice, and said second party or assigns shall be entitled to have a receiver appointed to take immediate possession of said land, and to have the net profits thereof applied on said indebtedness until the same shall have been fully paid. Said taking- possession shall in no way retard collection or foreclosure.”

The debt secured by the mortgage became due,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hecht v. DettmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  2. First National Bank of Grand Meadow v. Security Trust & Savings Bank of Charles CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. Downard v. GroffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  4. Whiteside v. MorrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. Swan v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Prudence Co. v. 160 West Seventy-Third Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Young v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Watt's Administrator v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Hatcher v. ForbesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  5. Louis v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API