Legal Opinion

State v. Bazile

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 24, 2012No. 2011-KK-2201PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEIMER, Justice.

hln an effort to prevent what were perceived as abusive practices by defendants in criminal cases exercising waivers of jury trials in order to disrupt trial schedules, the legislature enacted a proposed constitutional amendment which was submitted to the electorate.1 The constitutional amendment, which was approved by voters and is now contained in La. Const, art. I, § 17(A), provides in pertinent part: “Except in capital cases, a defendant may knowingly and intelligently waive his right to a trial by jury but no later than forty-five days prior to the trial date and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. State v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, ETC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  3. Ring v. STATE, DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  4. State v. MercadelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  5. State v. SchoeningSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BazileSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
  2. State v. WebbLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. State v. GibsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. State v. FrithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. State v. PrudhommeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API